SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(KER) 68

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
N. NAGARESH, J
GEORGE ANTONY – Appellant
Versus
RESERVE BANK OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates:
PRANOY K.KOTTARAM GEORGE MATHEWS, C.AJITH KUMAR

J U D G M E N T

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Dated this the 22nd day of December, 2021 The petitioners are aggrieved by Ext.P1 adverse Credit Report and seek to direct the 1st respondent to give appropriate directions to the 2nd respondent as envisaged under Section 11 of the Credit Information Companies (Regulation) Act, 2005 .

2. The 1st petitioner is a businessman and petitioners

2 and 3 are business establishments of which the 1st petitioner is the Managing Partner and Managing Director respectively. The 1st petitioner as well as the business establishments have availed loans/advances from various credit institutions. The grievance of the petitioners is that credit information with regard to some unrelated establishments have been considered while computing the Credit Score of the 1st petitioner, which has brought down the Credit Score of the 1st petitioner, assigned by the 2nd respondent Credit Information Company in Ext.P1.

3. The 2nd petitioner-G.K. Granites and the 3rd petitioner-Crystal Granites Ltd. are the business establishments in which the 1st petitioner has some interest. In Ext.P1, Permanent Account Number (PAN) of the 3rd petitioner-Crystal Granites Ltd. is wrongly indicated a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top