SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(KER) 833

DR.K.G.SANJAYAN – Appellant
Versus
CHERTHALA MUNICIPALITY – Respondent


Advocates:
['B PRAMOD', '', 'NAMITHA JYOTHISH', 'J OM PRAKASH']

JUDGMENT

The petitioner had applied for correction of his date of birth from 13.3.1955 to 30.11.1954. Initially, the application was rejected by the Municipality stating that the delay in applying has not been explained. The petitioner had filed W.P.(C)No.6596 of 2021 before this Court which was disposed of by Ext.P11 judgment dated 7.4.2021 directing the 2nd respondent to consider the application submitted by the petitioner in the light of the public documents like the entries in the SSLC book, electoral ID card Aadhaar card, Indian passport and PAN card issued to the petitioner. The Municipality had filed a review petition against the judgment and as per Ext.P13 judgment this Court had disposed of the review petition finding that the anxiety expressed by the respondents that they would be flouting the circular of the Registrar is unfounded. This Court categorically held that the delay has already been properly explained by the petitioner and that the circular issued by the Chief Registrar is only for the purpose of ensuring that unwanted delayed applications are not entertained by the subordinate officers.

2. The 2nd respondent has thereafter issued Ext.P14 wherein it is stated th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top