HIGH COURT OF KERALA
K VINOD CHANDRAN, C. JAYACHANDRAN, JJ
THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS – Appellant
Versus
NEERAJA J. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
K.Vinod Chandran, J.
This appeal is against the judgment of the learned Single Judge, directing the additional 4th respondent to carry out necessary correction in the name of the father and mother of the petitioner/ the 1st respondent herein, in accordance with Ext.P1 Birth Certificate, at the earliest and at any rate within six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the application.
2. The appellants seem to be labouring under a misconception that the directions issued would go contrary to the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court inJigya Yadav v. C.B.S.E. [2021 (3) KLT 711 SC)]. It is also pointed out that the learned Single Judge has followedSubin Mohammed v. Union of India ( 2016 (1) KLT 340 ), which has been overruled by the Hon'ble Supreme Court inJigya Yadav (supra). It is contended that the CBSE can only make corrections to the Date of Birth in accordance with school records. It is also pointed out that another Division Bench of this Court in Writ Appeal No.1184 of 2021, dated 27.09.2021, has directed such applications to be considered in accordance withJigya Yadav (supra).
3. We are unable to agree with the contention of the appellants that the directions run con
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.