SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(KER) 4014

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
K VINOD CHANDRAN, C. JAYACHANDRAN, JJ
THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS – Appellant
Versus
NEERAJA J. – Respondent


Advocates:
NIRMAL. S, SRI.B.K.GOPALAKRISHNAN

JUDGMENT

K.Vinod Chandran, J.

This appeal is against the judgment of the learned Single Judge, directing the additional 4th respondent to carry out necessary correction in the name of the father and mother of the petitioner/ the 1st respondent herein, in accordance with Ext.P1 Birth Certificate, at the earliest and at any rate within six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the application.

2. The appellants seem to be labouring under a misconception that the directions issued would go contrary to the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court inJigya Yadav v. C.B.S.E. [2021 (3) KLT 711 SC)]. It is also pointed out that the learned Single Judge has followedSubin Mohammed v. Union of India ( 2016 (1) KLT 340 ), which has been overruled by the Hon'ble Supreme Court inJigya Yadav (supra). It is contended that the CBSE can only make corrections to the Date of Birth in accordance with school records. It is also pointed out that another Division Bench of this Court in Writ Appeal No.1184 of 2021, dated 27.09.2021, has directed such applications to be considered in accordance withJigya Yadav (supra).

3. We are unable to agree with the contention of the appellants that the directions run con

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top