SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(KER) 701

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
GOPINATH P, J
K.BALAN – Appellant
Versus
P.P.HAIRUNNEESA, – Respondent


Advocates:
SRI.ZUBAIR PULIKKOOL, SRI.R.PARTHASARATHY, SRI.RENJIT GEORGE (PUBLIC PROSECUTOR)

JUDGMENT

This appeal has been filed by the complainant in C.C.No.146 of

2004 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court – II, Nadapuram, challenging the judgment dated 31.12.2005 through which the first respondent/accused was acquitted by the court, in a prosecution under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act .

2. According to the appellant/complainant, the first respondent/accused had purchased gold ornaments from a jewellery shop owned by the complainant on a credit basis and in the discharge of that liability, the accused had issued a cheque dated 13.10.2003 for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- drawn on the account maintained by the first respondent/accused in Kakkattil Co- operative Rural Bank (Aroor Branch). The cheque was returned unpaid for the reason that the drawer's signature differs from the specimen signature maintained by the Bank and also on account of the reason that funds were insufficient to pay the amount under the cheque. According to the appellant/complainant, after complying with all legal formalities contemplated by the Negotiable instruments Act, the subject complaint was filed alleging the commission of an offence under Section 138 of the Negoti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top