Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SHAJI P.CHALY, Murali Purushothaman, JJ
ABDUL WAHAB – Appellant
Versus
KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenging the delay in filing. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. recovery of debts from property. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. regulatory implications on ownership. (Para 8 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. court’s reasoning and dismissal of petition. (Para 12 , 13 , 15) |
O R D E R
C.R.
C.M. Appln 1 of 2021 and RP No.543 of 2021 in WA No.1867 of 2015
SHAJI P.CHALY, J
The said application is filed by the review petitioner seeking to condone the delay of 1103 days in filing the review petition. The judgment in which review sought was dismissed on 12.11.2015. The case projected by the petitioner is that, later when coercive proceedings were initiated to sell the property of the petitioner, W.P.(C). 34933/2018 was filed, which was disposed on 29.11.2018, leaving open the liberty of the petitioner to approach the Division Bench seeking review of the judgment in WA No.1867/2015 and till 20.12.2018, the coercive proceedings were directed to be kept in abeyance. The record of proceedings show that the review petition was filed on 22.12.2018 and it was lying dormant in the registry till it was posted before the bench on 13.08.2021 for condoning delay of 206 days in re-presenting the review petition after curing the defe
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
