SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Online)(KER) 14931

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
K.HARILAL, J
JOSE KURIAN – Appellant
Versus
P V JOY    Advocate - K M KURIAN ,K M KURIAN – Respondent


ORDER

The Revision Petitioner is the accused in S.T.

No.106/2008 of Judicial First Class Magistrate court -II, Idukki as well as appellant in Crl.A.No.129/2011 on the files of Additional Sessions Judge Thodupuzha. He was prosecuted for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (for short 'N.I.Act') on a complaint filed by the first respondent herein. The allegation against the Revision Petitioner is that in discharge of a legally enforceable debt, he issued a cheque for an amount of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) drawn in favour of the first respondent. When the cheque was presented for encashment the same was dishonoured for want of sufficient funds. Though the first respondent had issued a statutory notice claiming cheque amount, the Revision Petitioner has neither sent a reply, nor repaid amount. Hence Revision petitioner is committed offence punishable under Section 138 of the N.I.Act.

2. After trial the learned Magistrate found the accused guilty of the offence punishable under Section 138 of the N.I Act and convicted thereunder. He was sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for four months and also directed to pay compensation Rs.50,0

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top