Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S. DIAS, J
T.V.ARAVINDAKSHAN – Appellant
Versus
T.V.CHANDRIKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. dispute over partition order issued without co-owner request. (Para 2) |
| 2. arguments on improper orders made by the lower court. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court emphasized legal necessity of requests under partition act for auction. (Para 6 , 9 , 10 , 14) |
| 4. final decision mandates reconsideration of lower court's orders. (Para 16) |
JUDGMENT
The petitioners are the respondents 25 and 26 in I.A.No.4395/2009 in FDIA No.1721/1998 in O.S.208/1994 of the Court of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Thalassery. The respondents 1 and 2 in the original petition are the petitioners 2 and 3 in the above application, and the remaining respondents are the other respondents in the application. The respondents 28 to 42 are the legal representatives of the deceased respondents 3, 4 and 7. The parties are, for the sake of convenience and wherever the context so requires, referred to as per their status in the original petition.
2. The concise case of the petitioners, relevant for the determination of the original petition is:
(i) the petitioners were the defendants in the above suit and the legal representatives of the original plaintiff ― late Madhavi, who had filed the suit for partition. The court
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
