SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 81262

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BIJU JOSEPH – Appellant
Versus
JAIN JOSEPH – Respondent
AR 14/2022



IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS THURSDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2022 / 24TH BHADRA, 1944 AR NO. 14 OF 2022 PETITIONERS:

1 BIJU JOSEPH AGED 46 YEARS S/O.JOSEPH MADATHIKUNNEL PAIL, RESIDENT OF LIGUORI BHAVAN, CSSR PROVINCIAL HOUSE, MARROTTICHOODU, KALADI P.O., MATTOOR - 683 574, AUTHORISED SIGNATORY AND DESIGNATED PARTER OF NEO MEDIA SCHOOL LLP, A LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP HAVING ITS REGISTERED ADDRESS AT 39/2287, JANATHA JUNCTION, PALARIVATTOM - 682 025.

2 POLY ANTONY AGED 46 YEARS S/O.ANTONY, A RESIDENT OF REDEMPTORIST COMMUNITY, PB NO.8451, KARNATAKA - 560 084, PARTNER OF NEO MEDIA SCHOOL LLP, A LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP HAVING ITS REGISTERED ADDRESS AT 39/2287, JANATHA JUNCTION, PALARIVATTOM - 682 025.

3 SIJO JACOB THALIAYATH AGED 42 YEARS S/O.JACOB THALIYATH, "THALIYATH HOUSE", MALLUSSERY, VATTAPARAMBU P.O., ERNAKULAM - 683 579, PARTNER OF NEO MEDIA SCHOOL LLP, A LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP HAVING ITS REGISTERED ADDRESS AT 39/2287, JANATHA JUNCTION, PALARIVATTOM - 682 025.

BY ADVS. K.S.BHARATHAN ALPHIN ANTONY AADITHYAN S.MANNALI VISAKH ANTONY ABEL ANTONY CHRISTINE MATHEW RANCE R.

RESPONDENTS:

1 JAIN JOSEPH, AGED 55 YEARS, S/O.JOSEPH, DESIGNATED PARTNER OF NEO MEDIA SCHOOL LLP, RESIDING AT FLAT NO.601, NATIONAL PUZHAYORAM, DESOM P.O., ALUVA, KERALA, PIN - 683 102.

2 DEENA JAIN AGED 45 YEARS W/O.JAIN JOSEPH, PARTNER OF NEO MEDIA SCHOOL LLP, RESIDING AT PADATHIPARAMBIL HOUSE, OLLUR P.O., THRISSURE, KERALA, PIN - 680 306.

THIS ARBITRATION REQUEST HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON

15.09.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

Dated this the 15th day of September,2022

O R D E R

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the subject matter in dispute has been settled between the parties. Hence, the petitioners are no longer desirous of prosecuting the arbitration request.

2. The said submission is recorded.

The arbitration request is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

C.S.DIAS,JUDGE DST/15.09.22 //True copy/

P.A.To Judge

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top