SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 49156

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
S.MANIKUMAR, CJ, SHAJI P.CHALY, J
PRATHYASA MENTAL HEALTH COUNSELLING FORUM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C).No.11686 OF 2020(S)



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.SAJU JAKOB, SRI.ANIL KUMAR SREEDHARAN
For the Respondents: SRI. RANJITH THAMPAN, SRI.P.NARAYANAN, SRI P.VIJAYAKUMAR

Public interest litigations must be filed by recognized entities; unregistered bodies lack legal standing.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 21 - Public Interest Litigation - Maintainability of writ petition by unregistered body - The petitioners sought relief concerning social distancing measures in public transport amid COVID-19, stating that the impugned notification allowing full seating capacity violates public health principles. The Court ruled the writ petition is not maintainable as the petitioners are an unregistered body, hence lacking juristic personality. (Paras 4, 6, 14)

(B) The Court emphasized that public interest litigation serves the cause of societal welfare, but fundamental rights must be claimed by aggrieved individuals or recognized bodies. (Paras 8, 12, 14)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, a non-registered organization, filed a public interest writ petition against the Kerala Government's notification permitting full occupancy in public buses, arguing it jeopardizes community health due to COVID-19. The petitioner raised concerns about rising infections and the inadequacy of existing health measures.

Findings of Court:
The writ petition was found to be not maintainable as it was filed by an unregistered body lacking legal standing to initiate public interest litigation.

Issues: The core issues involved the legality of the government notification regarding public transport occupancy and the capability of an unregistered body to file a public interest litigation.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court concluded that only legally recognized entities or individuals suffering direct injury possess the standing to file such petitions, thus highlighting the necessity of maintaining legal structure in public interest litigation.

Result: Writ petition dismissed.

Table of Content
1. public interest litigation details. (Para 1 , 2)
2. impugned provision is arbitrary and harmful. (Para 3)
3. violation of health and safety regulations. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
4. justification of social distancing importance. (Para 10 , 11 , 12)
5. maintainability of unregistered body for pil. (Para 13)
6. judicial precedents and maintainability insights. (Para 14)

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 19th day of June, 2020 S. Manikumar, CJ Instant public interest writ petition is filed for the following reliefs:

(i) To direct respondents 1 & 2, State of Kerala represented by Chief Secretary and the Secretary, Transport (B) Department, Thiruvananthapuram - to forthwith ensure the strict/actual/practical compliance of social distancing norm in public places issued by respondent No.3, Ministry of Home Affairs, vide its Order No.40-3/2020-DM-1(A) dated 30th May, 2020, as mandated in national directives for COVID-19 management, in the clause 2);

(ii) To quash the impugned provision of Exhibit-P1 notification dated 2nd June, 2020, S.R.O. No.366/2020, allowing the buses to carry passengers in all the seats available in the stage carriers as it is in violation of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and above notification of Ministry of Home Affairs, and direct the respondents 1 and 2 to issue order directing passengers only to occupy 50% seats available, and to maintain a distance of six feet between passengers in public transport, till the vaccine for COVID-19 virus is invented or till the alternative solution is found or till the Central Government otherwise issues another order with respect to public transport/travel advisory;

(iii) To direct respondents 1 & 2, either to disinfect the vehicles and disinfect the seats when a passenger disembark;

(iv) To direct respondents 1 and 2, either to maintain six feet distance in the allocation of seats or to keep one passenger in one seat or in alternative seat or keep the middle seat vacant if it is a 3-seater chair to serve the purpose of social distancing in the buses with the stickers marking the seats to be left vacant.

2. Short facts leading to the filing of writ petition are as follows:-

Petitioner, a charitable non-registered organization, is constrained to file this public interest litigation against the impugned provision of Exhibit-P1 notification issued by the Transport Department, Government of Kerala vide No.GO(P) No 29/2020/Tran. S.R.O. No. 366/2020 dated 02.06.2020. The impugned provision is, “AND WHEREAS the Government have decided to relax the lockdown restrictions and decided to permit to carry passengers in all the seats available in the stage carriages". It is further stated that as per the impugned provision, State of Kerala has decided to relax the lockdown restrictions and as a result of which, permitted to carry passengers in all the seats available in the stage carriages. Petitioner has further stated that through the notification of Transport (B) Department, Government of Kerala vide SRO No. 333/2020 dated 19.05.2020, in order to effectuate the necessity of social distancing, Government have permitted to carry passengers not more than the 50% of seating capacity of the carriage. In the current situation, when it can be said that the spread of infection is almost on the verge of community transmission and where now more than 2 lakhs people have been infected in the country, State of Kerala has decided to relax the measures taken specifically for carrying out social distancing. The efforts of State of Kerala, in order to check the spread of COVID-19 has won accolades from across the globe, but the number of infected persons have grown up to 80 on the first day of June itself. Petitioner has further contended that the State of Kerala has tried its best to evanescence the COVID-19 out of Kerala and yet could not achieve the desired result, and the relaxation of social distancing measures during the lockdown period would adversely affect the health and life of peo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top