SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 77040

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SAROJINI SUVARNAKUMARI – Appellant
Versus
VISWANATHAN – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR TUESDAY ,THE 05TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2019 / 16TH MAGHA, 1940 SA.No. 249 of 2003 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 07-11-2001 IN AS 415/1996 of SUB COURT, NEDUMANGAD AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 30-09-1995 IN OS 779/1990 of ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF COURT,NEDUMANGAD APPELLANTS/APPELLANTS/PLAINTIFFS:

1 SAROJINI SUVARNAKUMARI ALUMKUZHI VEEDU, ETTIRUTHI MURI, KULATHUMMAL VILLAGE.

2 SAROJINI REMANI, OF DO. DO

3 SAROJINI GIRIJA, OF DO. DO.

4 SAROJINI CHANDRIKA, OF DO. DO

5 THANKAPPAN NAIR ANILKUMAR OF DO. DO

6 THANKAPPAN NAIR SURESHKUMAR, OF DO. DO BY ADV. SRI.G.S.REGHUNATH RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS:

1 * VISWANATHAN(DIED)

S/O. ANANDAN, ALUMKUZHI PUTHEN VEEDU, ETTURUTHI, KULATHUMMEL VILLAGE.

2 BHAVANI SAROJINI, KOTTAKKATTU VEEDU, SATHRAM JUNCTION, THEKKUMKARA MURI, NEDUMANGAD.

3 BHAVANI SARADA, KODIKONATHU VELIYIL VEEDU, CHEMPAZHANTHI, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, FROM CHAMAVILA PUTHEN VEEDU, ETTURUTHI MURI, KULATHUMMEL VILLAGE.

4 RAMANKUTTY PANICKER VISWANATHAN, ROADARIKATHU KULAYAMKONATHU VEEDU, KALLIKKAD FROM OOCHADIVILA VEEDU, POONJAMKOTTU MURI, KULATHUMMEL VILLAGE.

5 BHAVANI RUGMINI, TC 43/123, MEDAYI

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top