SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 27312

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
ANSHIF.K.R.@ MUNNA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
Bail Application|B.A.No.8097 of 2025|Crime No.389/2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.KODOTH SREEDHARAN
For the Respondents: SMT. SREEJA V.

Bail cannot be granted when the investigation is ongoing and serious allegations are pending against the accused.

Headnote:This bail application is filed under section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The petitioners, accused 3 and 4 in Crime No.389 of 2025, are accused of kidnapping the defacto complainant and robbing him of 20,743 USDT. The court opined that due to the serious allegations and ongoing investigation, bail cannot be granted at this time. The main issue was whether the petitioners should be released on bail considering the gravity of the offenses. The court highlighted the necessity of ensuring the integrity of the investigation as being a critical factor in its reasoning. Accordingly, the bail application is dismissed.

Table of Content
1. allegations of kidnapping and robbery against accused. (Para 2 , 3)
2. court considers the seriousness of allegations and ongoing investigation. (Para 4 , 5)

ORDER

This bail application is filed under section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 (for short ‘ BNSS ’).

2. Petitioners are accused 3 and 4 in Crime No.389 of 2025 of Kumbla Police Station, Kasaragod, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 137(2), 310(2) and 351 of the Bharathiya Nyaya Sanhita , 2023.

3. According to the prosecution, on 06.05.2025, the accused kidnapped the defacto complainant and physically assaulted him with their hands and robbed him of 20,743 USDT and thereby committed the offences alleged. Petitioners were arrested on 04.06.2025 and they have been in custody since then.

4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned Public Prosecutor.

5. Petitioners along with other accused are alleged to have kidnapped the defacto complainant and committed robbery of large amount of money.

Considering the seriousness of the allegations, I am of the view that petitioners cannot be released on bail, at this juncture, especially since the investigation has not been completed and accused 1 and 6 have not yet been arrested.

Accordingly, the bail application is dismissed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top