Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K. NARENDRAN, J
KERALA AUTOMOBILE DEALERS ASSOCIATION – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners are automobile dealers challenging a circular. (Para 1) |
| 2. writ petition seeks to quash the circular and notice regarding 'demo vehicles'. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 3. key issue involves vehicle registration necessity under mv act. (Para 6 , 8) |
| 4. petitioners argue 'demo vehicles' do not require registration. (Para 7 , 9) |
| 5. mv act and cmv rules outline registration requirements. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 6. rules on trade certificates and registrations for vehicles. (Para 14 , 15) |
| 7. legal precedent clarifies vehicle possession and registration mandates. (Para 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 8. court dismisses petition; circular and notices upheld. (Para 33) |
JUDGMENT
The 1st petitioner is an Association of Automobile dealers in Kerala, which is registered under the provisions of the Travancore-Cochin Literary, Scientific and Charitable Societies Registration Act, 1955, as evident from Ext.P1 certificate of registration dated 29.03.2006. The 2nd petitioner is a dealer of passenger vehicles manufactured by Mercedes-Benz and a member of the 1st petitioner Association. The petitioners have filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of certiorari to quash E
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
