Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Sathish Ninan, Shoba Annamma Eapen, JJ
SAJITHA – Appellant
Versus
ABDUL KAREEM – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the case background and parties' claims. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. claims and reliefs sought by the petitioner. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 3. analysis of limitation issues surrounding the petition. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. assessment of evidence regarding ownership and claims over property. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
JUDGMENT
Sathish Ninan, J.
The Original Petition filed by the husband against the wife, seeking declaration of his title over the property and for a direction to execute a registered conveyance in his favour in respect of the property and for prohibitory injunction against creating encumbrance, was decreed by the Family Court. The wife is in appeal.
2. For the sake of convenience, parties are hereinafter referred to as per their status in the O.P, the respondent herein being “the petitioner”, and the appellant herein being “the respondent”.
3. The marriage between the parties was solemnized on 13.06.1993. Two children were born in the wedlock. The petitioner was employed abroad even prior to the marriage. According to the petitioner, with his funds, a property was purchased in the joint names of the petitioner and his father
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
