IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
G. GIRISH, J
SIDHIQUE – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition for reopening evidence dismissed. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. need for further cross-examination established. (Para 3) |
| 3. arguments heard from both sides. (Para 4) |
| 4. court's discretion in witness recall emphasized. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
O R D E R
The first accused in S.C.No.588/2020 on the files of the Fast Track Special Court, Tirur has filed this petition under section 528 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, aggrieved by the refusal of the said court to reopen the evidence in that case for the further cross-examination of the victim child who was examined as PW2. The offences alleged in that case are under Sections 342, 367 and 377 IPC, and Sections 3(c), 4, 11(vi) & 12 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (stated hereafter as ‘the Act’ for the sake of convenience) and Section 77 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015.
2. At a time when the said case stood posted for hearing, after completion of prosecution and defence evidence, the petitioner had moved an application to reopen the evidence for recalling and further cross-examine PW2. The reason stated was that, after a thorough study of the evidence adduced by the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.