SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 30838

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE – Appellant
Versus
DR. CHITRA REVI W/O DINESH KRISHNAN ASSISTANT SURGEON – Respondent


JUDGMENT

P.Krishna Kumar, J.

The key issue in these cases is whether Assistant Surgeons appointed under the Kerala Health Service (Medical Officers) Special Rules, 2010 (‘Special Rules, for short) who have exercised the option for placement in the Speciality Cadre can later relinquish their right to such an appointment under Rule 38 of Part II of Kerala State & Subordinate Service Rules (‘KS&SSR’).

2. The petitioners are Assistant Surgeons in the Kerala State Health Service. Both petitioners opted for placement in the Speciality Cadre in 2013. However, in 2024, they submitted a request to relinquish their right to such an appointment in the Speciality Cadre, citing personal inconveniences. The Government rejected their request for relinquishment (the request made by one of them was not acted upon by the Government) on the ground that Rule 6 of the Special Rules prohibits it. The Government further proceeded to post them in the Speciality Cadre. Aggrieved by this decision, the petitioners approached the Kerala Administrative Tribunal. Through the impugned common order, the Tribunal found that the petitioners are entitled to relinquish the option exercised by them as per the provisions

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top