Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
RAHUL RAJENDRAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction and admission of bail application. (Para 1) |
| 2. petitioner accused of fraud regarding job visa. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. court's initial observations before granting bail. (Para 4) |
| 4. arguments against and in favor of bail application. (Para 5) |
| 5. denial of necessity for custodial interrogation. (Para 7) |
| 6. conditions applied to granted bail to ensure cooperation. (Para 8) |
ORDER
This bail application is filed under section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 (for short ‘ BNSS ’).
2. Petitioner is the 4th accused in Crime No.1215 of 2024 of Thrissur East Police Station, registered for the offences punishable under sections 420 and 406 r/w Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.
3. According to the prosecution, petitioner along with other accused promised the de-facto complainant to provide job visa to Malta and received Rs.3,10,000/ from the de-facto complainant, but thereafter failed to provide job visa and thus committed the offences alleged.
4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Public Prosecutor.
5. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been falsely arrayed as an accused and ha
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
