Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K. Babu, J
MAZOOD SHAJAHAN – Appellant
Versus
SPECIAL SALE OFFICER TVPM. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners seek multiple directives regarding property. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court states importance of compliance with orders. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. no further relief necessary as prior directives have been met. (Para 5) |
JUDGMENT
The prayers in this Writ Petition are as follows:-
i. To issue an order or direction to the 1st respondent Special Sale OfÏcer to consider and dispose the Ext. P13 representation as expeditiously as possible within a time fixed by this Hon'ble Court.
ii. To call for the records leading to the attachment of petitioner's property vide Ext. P1 sale certificate and quash the same.
iii. To dispense the petitioner from filing English translation of the documents produced in vernacular language in this Writ Petition.
iv. Issue such other writ, direction or order that this Hon'ble Court may deem fit, just and necessary in the facts and circumstances of the case.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the respondents.
3. On 25.03.25, this Court passed the following order:-
“There will be an interim direction to the 1st respondent to consider Ext.P13, in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within a peri
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
