Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S. DIAS, J
Lathika. P – Appellant
Versus
The State of Kerala – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition related to land ownership and classification. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. hearing of petition and government response. (Para 3) |
| 3. court's directive for timely action on application. (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 25th day of June, 2025 The writ petition is filed to direct the third respondent to consider Ext. P2 application submitted in Form 6 by the petitioner under Section 27A read with Rule 12(1) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act and Rules, 2008 ('Act and Rules' in short).
2. The petitioner is the owner in possession of 11 Ares and 72.1 sq.meters of land comprised in Re-Survey Nos. 89/52 and 89/54 of Valayanad Village, Kozhikode Taluk, covered by Ext. P1 land tax receipt. The petitioner’s property is an unnotified land. However, the respondents have erroneously classified the property as ‘paddy land’ in the revenue records. To change the nature of the property, the petitioner has submitted Ext. P2 application before the third respondent on 04.03.2024. But, the same has not been considered till date.
3. Heard; the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.
4. On a consideration of the facts and materials on record,
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
