Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
M/S.CHANDRAGIRI CONSTRUCTION COMPANY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petition challenging administrative findings based on contract termination. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioner asserts reasons for delay beyond its control. (Para 3) |
| 3. court finds administrative order lacked adherence to judicial instructions. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. court rules on the necessity for proper administrative justifications. (Para 6) |
JUDGMENT
The petitioner, a construction company, has filed the captioned writ petition, seeking to challenge the findings contained in Ext.P22 order issued by the 6th respondent.
2. I have heard Sri.Shashank Devan, the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri.P.I.Davis, the learned Special Government Pleader (Irrigation), on behalf of the respondents herein.
3. This Court notices that as against the termination of the contract at the risk and cost of the petitioner by Ext.P13, the petitioner was before this Court in an earlier round of litigation by filing W.P.(C) No.21566 of 2017. In the afore writ petition, the petitioner has specifically pointed out that it is not challenging the termination of the contract, however, it took up the contention that the question as regards the delay in completion of the work can be attributed fo
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
