Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Judge, J
Petitioner – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. description of the allegations against the petitioner. (Para 2 , 3 , 5) |
| 2. arguments presented by both parties regarding the nature of allegations and bail. (Para 4 , 6) |
| 3. court's considerations and findings regarding anticipatory bail. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. conditions laid down for granting bail. (Para 10) |
ORDER
This is an application seeking pre-arrest bail filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 .
2. Petitioner is the first accused in Crime No.376 of 2025 of Chavakkad Police Station, Thrissur District; registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 131, 115(2), 118(1), 109, 309(4), 309(6), and 351(3) r/w Section 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short, ‘the BNS’). During the course of investigation, the offence under Section 109 of BNS has been deleted.
3. According to the prosecution, petitioner, along with the other accused, assaulted the defacto complainant and committed theft of the vehicle bearing No.KL-16-K-7515, a Samsung phone apart from an amount of Rs.49,000/-, and thereby committed the offences alleged.
4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Public Prosecutor.
5. Pet
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
