IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Sathish Ninan, J
RAKESH PRABHA – Appellant
Versus
SREEJAMOL – Respondent
Sathish Ninan, J.
These appeals are by the husband, challenging the judgments of the Family Court in proceedings inter se the wife.
2. Mat.Appeal No.877 of 2019 arise from O.P.No.1216 of 2013. The original petition was one filed by the husband against the wife, seeking dissolution of marriage. The original petition was dismissed by the Family Court.
3. Mat.Appeal No.878 of 2019 arise from O.P.No.1217 of 2013. The original petition was filed by the husband against the wife, seeking return of 'Thali'. The original petition was dismissed by the Family Court.
4. Mat.Appeal No.859 of 2019 arise from O.P.No.980 of 2014. The original petition was one filed by the wife against the husband, seeking return of gold ornaments and money. The original petition was decreed in part.
5. Mat.Appeal No.879 of 2019 arise from O.P.No.801 of 2014. The original petition was filed by the wife against the husband, seeking custody of the minor child born in the wedlock. The original petition was allowed.
6. The marriage between the parties was solemnised on 21.10.2010. A daughter was born in the wedlock. At the time of marriage, the husband was a constable in CRPF and the wife was working abroad. According to the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.