SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 33820

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Sathish Ninan, J
RAKESH PRABHA – Appellant
Versus
SREEJAMOL – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Not Provided
For the Respondents: Not Provided

Sathish Ninan, J.

These appeals are by the husband, challenging the judgments of the Family Court in proceedings inter se the wife.

2. Mat.Appeal No.877 of 2019 arise from O.P.No.1216 of 2013. The original petition was one filed by the husband against the wife, seeking dissolution of marriage. The original petition was dismissed by the Family Court.

3. Mat.Appeal No.878 of 2019 arise from O.P.No.1217 of 2013. The original petition was filed by the husband against the wife, seeking return of 'Thali'. The original petition was dismissed by the Family Court.

4. Mat.Appeal No.859 of 2019 arise from O.P.No.980 of 2014. The original petition was one filed by the wife against the husband, seeking return of gold ornaments and money. The original petition was decreed in part.

5. Mat.Appeal No.879 of 2019 arise from O.P.No.801 of 2014. The original petition was filed by the wife against the husband, seeking custody of the minor child born in the wedlock. The original petition was allowed.

6. The marriage between the parties was solemnised on 21.10.2010. A daughter was born in the wedlock. At the time of marriage, the husband was a constable in CRPF and the wife was working abroad. According to the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top