Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Sathish Ninan, J
RAKESH PRABHA – Appellant
Versus
SREEJAMOL – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of appeals regarding marital disputes (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. consideration of child custody and its implications (Para 9 , 13 , 14) |
| 3. claims for gold ornaments and financial contributions evaluated (Para 10 , 11 , 15) |
| 4. legal grounds for granting divorce established (Para 16) |
| 5. final decisions and orders of the court articulated (Para 17) |
Sathish Ninan, J.
These appeals are by the husband, challenging the judgments of the Family Court in proceedings inter se the wife.
2. Mat.Appeal No.877 of 2019 arise from O.P.No.1216 of 2013. The original petition was one filed by the husband against the wife, seeking dissolution of marriage. The original petition was dismissed by the Family Court.
3. Mat.Appeal No.878 of 2019 arise from O.P.No.1217 of 2013. The original petition was filed by the husband against the wife, seeking return of 'Thali'. The original petition was dismissed by the Family Court.
4. Mat.Appeal No.859 of 2019 arise from O.P.No.980 of 2014. The original petition was one filed by the wife against the husband, seeking return of gold ornaments and money. The original petition was decreed in part.
5. Mat.Appeal No.879 of 2019 arise from O.P.No.801 of
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
