IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
SIDHAN@ SIDHARATHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. apprehension of arrest and allegations (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments against bail maintainability due to sc/st offences (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's ruling on bail application dismissal (Para 5) |
O R D E R
Petitioner apprehends arrest in Crime No.371 of 2025 of Kodakara Police Station, Thrissur, registered alleging offences punishable under Sections 126 (2), 118(1), 296(a) and
110 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘ BNS ’).
2. According to the prosecution, on 16.04.2025, due to a previous animosity the accused restrained the de facto complainant and inflicted injuries on him and thereby committed the offences alleged.
3. I have heard Sri.P Vijayabanu, the learned senior counsel as instructed by Sri.Ajesh K Sasi, on behalf of the petitioner, Sri.Noushad K A, the learned Public Prosecutor and and Sri.Dinesh Mathew J Murikan, the learned counsel for the de facto complainant.
4. The learned Public Prosecutor, upon instructions, and the learned counsel for the de facto complainant submitted that this bail application is not maintainable since the offence under SC/ST Act has been incorporated.
5. Since the offence under SC/ST Act has been incorporated, in the light of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.