Back
Next 
2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 34369
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
SANCY. S – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(CRL.) NO. 793 OF 2025
Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.RENJITH B.MARAR, SMT.LAKSHMI.N.KAIMAL, SRI.P.RAJKUMAR, SRI.KESHAVRAJ NAIR, SHRI.BIJU VIGNESWAR, SHRI.ARUN POOMULLI, SHRI.ABHIRAM.S., SMT.GAADHA SURESH, SRI.T.K.BABU, SRI.VISWANATH JAYAN, SMT.AKHILA RADHAKRISHNAN, SMT.SARIGA RAMACHANDRAN M., SHRI.AKSHAY SHIBU
For the Respondents: SRI.HRITHWIK C S., SR PP
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.RENJITH B.MARAR, SMT.LAKSHMI.N.KAIMAL, SRI.P.RAJKUMAR, SRI.KESHAVRAJ NAIR, SHRI.BIJU VIGNESWAR, SHRI.ARUN POOMULLI, SHRI.ABHIRAM.S., SMT.GAADHA SURESH, SRI.T.K.BABU, SRI.VISWANATH JAYAN, SMT.AKHILA RADHAKRISHNAN, SMT.SARIGA RAMACHANDRAN M., SHRI.AKSHAY SHIBU
For the Respondents: SRI.HRITHWIK C S., SR PP
A petitioner can withdraw a writ petition with liberty to file a fresh application before the concerned authority.
Headnote:This judgment pertains to WP(CRL.) No. 793 of 2025, where the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. The court grants liberty to file a fresh application with legal contentions before the concerned authority, leading to the dismissal of the writ petition as withdrawn. The court's findings confirm the withdrawal. The petitioner has the right to approach the concerned authority again.
JUDGMENT
When this Writ Petition (Crl.) came up for consideration, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this Writ Petition with liberty to file a fresh application with legal contentions before the authority concerned.
Liberty is granted.
Therefore, this Writ Petition (Crl.) is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/-
