Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Judge, J
RAJU K.K. – Appellant
Versus
SAROJ NAIR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. accident details and initial compensation awarded are established. (Para 2 , 4 , 6) |
| 2. debate on contributory negligence based on evidence presented. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. court mandates future compensation for assessed disability. (Para 11) |
| 4. final ruling allows appeal and enhances compensation based on detailed assessment. (Para 12) |
J U D G M E N T
This appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (the Act) has been filed by the claim petitioner in O.P.(MV) No.2094/2012 on the file of the Additional Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Thrissur, (the Tribunal), aggrieved by the amount of compensation granted by Award dated 21/05/2019. The respondents herein are the respondents in the petition. In this appeal, the parties and the documents will be referred to as described in the original petition.
2. According to the claim petitioner, on 04/09/2011 at about 09:30 p.m., while he was riding his motorcycle bearing registration No.KL-08/AU-9313 through Perumbillissery- Poochinnipadam public road and when he reached near Murali Tile Factory, Poochinnipadam, car bearing registration No.KL-08/AL- 4048 driven by the second respondent in a rash and negligent manner k
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
