Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K. Babu, J
DESIGN 4 TILES AND GRANITE SANITARY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks to register workers under employment rules. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments presented on employment rights and registration validity. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's authority to assess employment status for work registration. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. court allows writ petition, mandates registration. (Para 10) |
JUDGMENT
The prayers in this Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India are as follows:-
“i) issue a writ of Certiorari or other appropriate writ or order, set aside Ext.P3 and P5 orders;
ii) issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ or order or direction directing the respondent No. 2 to allow Ext.P2 application and register the five ‘attached headload workers’ of the petitioner’s establishment under Rule 26A of the ‘Kerala Headload Workers Rules’, at the earliest, at any rate within a time limit as fixed by this Hon’ble Court;
iii) issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ or order or direction directing the respondent No. 2 to allow Ext.P4 appeal, at the earliest at any rate within a time limit as fixed by this Hon’ble Court;
iv) to number the case by dispensing the translation of the documents produced by the petition
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
