Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
THAHIRA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. conviction upheld based on established statutory provisions. (Para 2) |
| 2. appellate court confirms lower court findings. (Para 3) |
| 3. presumption of liability under ni act applied. (Para 4) |
| 4. insufficient defense by accused led to conviction. (Para 5) |
ORDER
The above Criminal Revision Petition is filed seeking the following reliefs :-
“To set aside the conviction and sentence passed against the Revision Petitioner/Appellant/Accused in STC No.89/2020 on the files of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court Kannur-V as confirmed in Crl.Appeal No.317/2023 on the files of the Sessions Court, Thalassery, and acquit the Revision Petitioner, in the interest of justice.”[SIC]
2. This Criminal Revision Petition is filed against the concurrent finding of conviction and sentence imposed on the revision petitioner by the trial court and the appellate court. The revision petitioner is the accused in STC No.89/2020 on the file of Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-V, Kannur. It is a prosecution initiated against the petitioner alleging offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for short 'NI Act'). The learned Magistrate after a full fledged tr
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
