Back
2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 35191
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
UMMER FAROOQUE – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
Bail Appl. No. 8200 of 2025
Important Points
Subject
Criminal Law - Bail Application
Act Referred
Headnote
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.SADIQALI. M, SHRI.MUHAMMAD SABIK, SHRI.MOHAMED SHAFI M
For the Respondents: SMT. SREEJA V., PP
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. accused is charged with transporting river sand. (Para 2) |
| 2. previous ruling states related offences are bailable. (Para 5) |
| 3. court closed the bail application based on findings. (Para 6) |
O R D E R
This bail application is filed under section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 (for short ‘ BNSS ’).
2. Petitioner is the accused in Crime No.981 of 2025 of Tirur Police Station, Malappuram, registered for the offences punishable under Section 305 (e) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita , 2023 (for short ‘ BNS ’) apart from Section 20 r/w Section 23 of the Kerala Protection of River Banks and Regulation of Removal of Sand Act , 2001 (for short, ‘the Sand Act’).
3. According to the prosecution, the accused had, on
11.06.2025, transported river sand in a vehicle bearing registration No.KL-20-B-2159, thereby committing the offence alleged.
4. I have heard Sri. Sadiqali M., the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Smt.Sreeja V., the learned Public Prosecutor.
5. In the decision inMohammed Noufal v. State of Kerala [(2021) SCC Online Ker 5858] , this Court has held that Sections 20 and 23 of the Sand Act are bailable in nature. It was also observed that, when a special law covering the question of theft of river sand has been enacted, the offence under IPC for theft of river sand cannot be attracted. After the coming into force of BNS Act, the relevant provision for theft is Section 305 (e) of . Petitioner is alleged to have committed the offence under Section
305(e) ie., theft of river sand.
6. In view of the decision inMohammed Noufal’s case (supra), the offence under Section 305 (e) of BNS cannot be attracted. Since the remaining offences alleged against the petitioner are bailable, petitioner’s apprehension of arrest in connection with a non-bailable offence does not subsist.
Accordingly, the bail application is closed.
