Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S. DIAS, J
ABDUL AZEEZ M – Appellant
Versus
THENJIPALAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's right to a timely decision on regularisation. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court's directive for expedited processing of applications. (Para 3 , 4) |
JUDGMENT
The writ petition is filed to direct the second respondent to consider the regularisation application submitted by the petitioner, expeditiously.
2. The petitioner is the owner in possession of the property covered under Ext. P2 possession certificate, which is situated within the territorial limits of the first respondent. The petitioner has constructed a building in the said property. The petitioner has submitted an application for regularization of the construction on 25.02.2025, as evidenced by Ext. P4 receipt. But, the application has not been considered till date. Hence, the writ petition.
3. Heard; the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents.
4. On a consideration of the facts and the materials on record, especially that the application is pending consideration before the second respondent since 25.02.2025, without expressing anything on the merits of the matter, I dispose of the writ petition by directing the second respondent to consider and dispose
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
