Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
AVARACHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's request for property documentation. (Para 1 , 2 , 4) |
| 2. respondents to review submitted documents. (Para 3) |
| 3. court directed issuance of ror certificate. (Para 5) |
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 11th day of July, 2025
These cases are filed essentially seeking a direction to respondents 3 and 4 to effect mutation and issue ROR (Record of Rights) certificate to the petitioners’ property.
2. WP(C) No.23929 of 2022 is treated as the leading case and I will be adverting to the facts of the said case. The petitioner has obtained certain extent of land as per Ext.P1 registered janmam assignment deed. After obtaining the property petitioner has been paying tax as evident from Ext.P2. After creating the land data entry in the computer, a temporary thandaper number was created, and tax receipt was also received. Possession certificate was also issued to the petitioner. The property covered by Ext.P1 is a rubber plantation, but agricultural operations could not be done profitably because of climate change and trespass of wild animals from the nearby forest, and therefore the petitioner intents to sell the property for which ROR certificate is necessary. Thereupon Ext.P5 ap
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
