IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
T. R. Ravi, J
UDAYAN C.K – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. need for notice before disciplinary action (Para 2) |
JUDGMENT
The grievance of the petitioners is that without putting them on notice, a direction to initiate disciplinary action for imposing major penalty has been directed in Ext.P4 order, which is not warranted under Section 20 of the Right to Information Act , 2005. The petitioners rely on the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court inManohar vs. State of Maharashtra and Another [2012 KHC 4771] which has been followed by a learned Single Judge of this Court in P.N.Praveen Kumar vs. State Information Commissioner and Another in W.P(C).No.25864 of 2011 . In Ext.P4 order in Paragraph 27(1)
(c) the Commission has directed as follows:
“This Commission also direct the Director of General Education to authorize a senior officer not below the rank of an Additional Director to conduct a detailed, thorough, & meaningful inquiry into the matter of the 'missing' files (especially file no's: G/992/2019, G/390/2015, G/184/2019, & B/2638/2019) in the O/o. the AEO Alathur, Palakkad District and initiate regular departmental action for major penalty proceedings against all the officials responsible for the loss/missing/misplacemen
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.