Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
AMIT RAWAL, J
SHAJI MOHAN – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the case questions the validity of a no-confidence motion against an elected committee. (Para 2) |
| 2. procedures for initiating and conducting a no-confidence motion must comply with legal rules. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. arguments concerning delegate readiness and voting legality were central to the appeal. (Para 6 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. judicial review ensures that cooperatives conform to constitutional and procedural integrity. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. compliance with statutory rules dictates the validity of actions in no-confidence motions. (Para 13 , 14) |
| 6. the appeal affirmed the necessity of observing legal processes in cooperative governance. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
Dated this the 12th day of June, 2025 Amit Rawal, J.
The present intra court appeal is directed against the order dated 03.06.2025 rejecting the interim prayer to keep in abeyance the no-confidence motion against the elected Managing Committee of the Apex Society namely Kerala State Co-operative Agricultural and Rural Development Bank Ltd, sought in the writ petition claiming the following reliefs:-
“i. Issue a writ in the nature of certiorari calling for records and leading to Exhibits P6 to P8 and to quash the same as t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
