Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
V. G. Arun, J
AYOOB PULIKKAL MOHAMMED – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. initial payments made indicate no intent to cheat. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. complainant's allegations stem from payments and non-payment for coconuts. (Para 3) |
| 3. disputes in commercial dealings should not lead to criminal charges. (Para 4) |
| 4. the evidence does not support criminal intentions. (Para 5 , 6) |
ORDER
Dated this the 18th day of June, 2025 Petitioner is the 2nd accused in Crime No.1126 of
2022 registered at the Kannur Town Police Station for the offence punishable under Section 420 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code , now pending as C.C.No.142 of 2023 on the files of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-I, Kannur.
2. The crime was registered on the basis of a complaint filed by the 3rd respondent. The allegations in the complaint are to the following effect;
The complainant is the director of an enterprise named Malabar Agri Expo and Delta Trading Middle East EZE, which is engaged in the business of exporting coconuts. Pursuant to an agreement arrived at between the complainant's enterprise and the 1st accused, coconuts were exported based on the orders placed by the accused from 2018 onward. Although the payments for the initial consignments were made prompt
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
