SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 37330

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Ziyad Rahman A. A, J
KAVUMKAL ROAD BUILDERS – Appellant
Versus
THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1 & TPS – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 45660 OF 2024 | WP(C).29167/2021



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: MR. SABU KURIAKOSE, SRI.RAMESH CHERIAN JOHN
For the Respondents: SHRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, KERALA, SRI.CYRIAC TOM

Taxpayer's missed deadlines deny relief under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2020; however, application for original assessments eligible under the 2024 scheme, providing settlements despite ongoing reassessment issues.

Headnote:(A) Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 - Sections 3 and 5 - Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024 - Denial of benefits under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme due to delays in payment - Court emphasized that statutory timelines are crucial, and lapses cannot be statistically overcome by individual circumstances; relief denied for scheme 2020 while allowing benefits under scheme 2024. (Paras 10-16)

(B) Writ Jurisdiction - The court affirmed that where statutory requirements are unmet, relief under tax schemes cannot be provided; however, it highlighted that taxpayers should have the opportunity to settle disputes from original assessments despite ongoing reassessment procedures. (Paras 11-22)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner challenged the denial of benefits under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme due to missed payment deadlines tied to health issues. The application under the scheme was rejected citing that the tax for the assessment year 2015-2016 was not ascertainable as proceedings for reassessment were pending.

Findings of Court:
The petitioner was ultimately granted the benefits of the Scheme 2024 for the original assessment while the earlier petition was dismissed.

Issues: The main issues were whether the taxpayer's failure to pay within statutory time led to loss of eligibility and the interpretation of ongoing reassessment vis-à-vis the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that missed deadlines under tax schemes do not allow for relief based on individual circumstances, but affirmed that disputes regarding original assessments can still be settled if the original tax is ascertainable.

Result: W.P.

(C) No.45660/2024 allowed; W.P.

(C) No.29167/2021 dismissed.

Table of Content
1. overview of writ petitions and relevant tax schemes (Para 2 , 3 , 5 , 6)
2. arguments regarding scheme eligibility and application (Para 4 , 10 , 12)
3. court's analysis of tax scheme provisions (Para 11 , 13 , 15)
4. final decision on petitioner's entitlement to scheme benefits (Para 16)

JUDGMENT

[WP(C) Nos.45660/2024, 29167/2021]

Both these writ petitions are filed by the petitioner, being aggrieved by the denial of reliefs in the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2020 and the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024 . The assessment year pertains to which the dispute arose in these writ petitions is 2015-2016. W.P.(C) No.29167/2021 was filed by the petitioner, being aggrieved by the denial of Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2020, whereas W.P.(C) No.45660/2024 is filed by the petitioner being aggrieved by the denial of the benefit under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2024. The facts, which led to the filing of these writ petitions, are as follows: W.P.(C) No.29167/2021

2. In respect of the assessment year 2015-2016, the petitioner had already submitted an appeal, which is now

6 pending before the first appellate authority. While so, the Government introduced the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act , 2020, by which a scheme was contemplated for settling the income tax arrears. As per Section 3 thereof, the petitioner has to make a declaration, before the designated authority, in the manner contemplated under Section 4 , seeking the benefits of the same. Accordingly, the petitioner submitted Ext.P1 declaration in the prescribed form on 22.12.2020. As per the scheme, when it was initially introduced, if the amount payable under the Act was to be paid on or before 31.03.2020, the actual amount payable would be equal to the disputed tax, whereas, if the amount was to be paid after the first day of April 2020, but before the last date prescribed for the payment, the amount should be the aggregate of the amount of disputed tax plus 10% of the disputed tax.

3. As per Section 5 of the Direct Tax Vivad Se 7 Vishwas Act, 2020 (hereinafter referred to as ‘Act 2020’) upon receipt of a declaration as contemplated under Section 3 , the designated authority has to determine the amount payable by the declarant in accordance with the provisions of the Act and to grant a certificate to the declarant containing the particulars of the tax arrears and the amount payable after such determination in the form prescribed in this regard within a period of 15 days. In this case, even though Ext.P1 declaration was submitted on 22.12.2020, the certificate was issued as evidenced by Ext.P3 in Form 3, only on 21.09.2021. The case of the petitioner is that, by that time, due to various physical ailments, the petitioner was not in a position to attend his office and he was later admitted to Rajagiri Hospital, Aluva, for renal failure and cardiac issues on 27.10.2021 and he was discharged on 30.10.2021. According to the petitioner, after getting rid of the physical ailments he attended the office only on 25.11.2021 and the payment

8 determined as per Ext.P3, which was Rs.2,44,286/- was remitted on the same day itself. Ext.P6 is the taxpayer counter foil evidencing the said payment.

4. After making the payment, as required under Section 5 (2), the petitioner attempted to intimate the details of such payment to the designated authority through online mode as evidenced by Ext.P7, but, the same was not accepted, showing an error. Apparently, the reason for not accepting the same was that, the payment was effected beyond the statutory period, which stood extended up to 31.10.2021. W.P(C) No.29167/2021 was filed by the petitioner, in such circumstances, to direct the 2nd respondent to accept the deposit made by the petitioner as evidenced by Ext.P6 and to grant the benefit of the Act, 2020.

W.P(C) No.45660 of 2024

5. During the pendency of W.P(C) No.29167/2021 9 before this Court, the Government introduced the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2024 as per the Finance

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top