Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
SUSAMMA T. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. fraud allegations against accused and the role of the petitioner. (Para 2) |
| 2. allegations of job fraud and accused's involvement (Para 3 , 5 , 7) |
| 3. arguments for and against granting bail, including the role of petitioner. (Para 4) |
| 4. assessment of custodial interrogation necessity (Para 8 , 9) |
| 5. conditions for approving bail application (Para 10) |
ORDER
This bail application is filed under section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘ BNSS ’).
2. Petitioner is the 3rd accused in Crime No.226 of 2025 of Cherthala Police Station, Alappuzha, registered for the offence punishable under section 420 r/w Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 .
3. The prosecution case is that the accused offered a job to the defacto complainant in U.K.and obtained an amount of Rs.11,46,848/- and thereafter failed to provide the job or return the amount and thereby committed the offences alleged.
4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Public Prosecutor as well as the learned counsel for the defacto complainant.
5. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that petitioner has been falsely arrayed as an accused and that he has no inv
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
