Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P. G. Ajithkumar, J
ATHIRA ARUNKUMAR NAIR – Appellant
Versus
SREEJITH GOPALA PILLAI – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks timely action on maintenance application. (Para 2) |
| 2. court directs consideration of the application within three weeks. (Para 3) |
JUDGMENT
The above Original Petition (Crl) is filed with the following prayers:
" To direct Family Court Thiruvananthapuram to dispose of Ext.P2 (Crl. MP 2 /2024 in MC 238/2024) pending before the said court, within a short time, to be fixed by this Hon’ble Court;"
[SIC]
2. The way in which this Original Petition(Crl) is going to be disposed of, I think, no notice is necessary to the respondent. According to the petitioner, she filed an application under Section 144 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita ( BNSS ),2023, along with an application for interim maintenance. The application was filed on 11.11.2024. The respondent appeared and filed an objection. The grievance of the petitioner is that, the interim maintenance application filed by the petitioner is not considered.
Hence, this Original Petition (Crl).
3. As per the 3rd proviso to Section 144 BNSS , an application for interim maintenance is to be disposed of within 60 days. According to the petitioner, that period is already over. If that is the case, it is the d
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
