SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 38623

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Easwaran S., J
JIBU MATHEW – Appellant
Versus
ST.MICHAELS CHURCH – Respondent
RSA NO. 925 OF 2013|RSA NO. 941 OF 2013|RSA NO. 1064 OF 2013|AS NO.120 OF 2009|AS NO.119 OF 2009|AS NO.121 OF 2009|OS NO.252 OF 2004|OS NO.802 OF 2003



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.GEORGE CHERIAN (SR.), SRI.GEORGE A.CHERIAN, SMT.K.S.SANTHI, SMT.LATHA SUSAN CHERIAN, SMT.ALEXY AUGUSTINE
For the Respondents: SRI.K.JAYAKUMAR (SR.), SRI.JOHN JOSEPH VETTIKAD, SRI.C.JOSEPH JOHNY

The court established that the licence granted to the Catholic Young Men's Association was revocable based on conditions set by the church, affirming the authority of the Vicar to represent the church in legal matters.

Headnote:(A) Indian Easements Act, 1882 - Section 60 - Legality of licence - Dispute regarding revocability of licence granted to Catholic Young Men's Association by St. Michaels Church, to use church property. Court establishes the nature of licence granted, concluding it is revocable and dependent on conditions established by church. (Paras 12, 21, 24, 28, 30)

(B) Jurisdiction of Church authorities - Examination of the authority of the Vicar to represent the Church in legal proceedings, upheld by the Court. (Paras 12, 20, 21)

Facts of the case:
The dispute originates from a suit by St. Michaels Church against the Catholic Young Men's Association regarding the use of church property, with both parties claiming revocability or irrevocability of the licence agreed upon for property use.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the authority to represent the church included the Vicar, and the licence was revocable based on uncommunicated conditions associated with its grant, which were confirmed in the church's documentation.

Issues: Whether the licence granted to the association was revocable or irrevocable and the authority of the Vicar to represent the church in legal matters.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the licence was revocable, emphasizing the necessity of specified conditions under which it was granted, thus supporting the plaintiff's claim for eviction based on the association's non-compliance.

Result: Appeals dismissed.

Table of Content
1. overview of appeals and church history. (Para 1 , 2)
2. st. michaels church's argument regarding the revocable license. (Para 3)
3. trial court findings on license and injunction. (Para 4 , 5)
4. defendants' argument for an irrevocable license. (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
5. substantial questions of law identified. (Para 11 , 12)
6. church representation by the vicar in legal matters. (Para 16 , 18)
7. sequence of events leading to license agreement. (Para 21 , 22)
8. nature of the license as revocable. (Para 23 , 24 , 25)
9. analysis of byelaw and implications on license. (Para 27 , 29)
10. final ruling on the license nature and costs. (Para 30 , 31)

JUDGMENT

These three appeals arise out of the concurrent findings of the Additional Munsiff’s Court, Alappuzha, in judgment and decree dated 23.9.2009 in OS Nos.252/2004 and 802/2003 and that of the Additional District Court, Alappuzha, in judgment and decree dated 28.2.2013 in AS Nos.119/2009, 120/2009 and 121/2009.

2. The brief facts necessary for the disposal of the appeals are as follows:

St.Michaels Church is a Roman Catholic Church under the Arch Diocese of Changanacherry. Under the St.Michaels Church, an unregistered association of young catholic men was formed and was named as Catholic Young Men’s Association (CYMA). The Association was formed in the year 1922 from among the members of the parishioners. While so, an application was given for allotment of the land belonging to St.Michaels Church, in order to enable the Catholic Young Men’s Association to establish a rest house as well as a library. This was done presumably expecting a grant from the then Government. Accordingly, an application was given to the Church by the Catholic Young Men’s Association seeking allotment of the land. The said application was processed by the general body (hereinafter referred to as ’pothuyogam’, for short) of the Church in its meeting held on 28.11.1926 and decided to accept the application on certain conditions. One of the conditions is that, the land, if required in future for the Church, should be returned by the Catholic Young Men’s Association, subject to the entitlement to receive the cost of the construction. Under the hierarchy of the Church, the decision of the pothuyogam has to be approved by the Bishop. Hence, after the decision, the Church forwarded the application along with the decision for the approval of the Bishop. It is stated that the Bishop wanted to peruse the byelaw of the Association and hence, granted permission temporarily until the approval is given to the byelaw. Later, in the year 1946, the Catholic Young Men’s Association made a further request for allotment of additional land for the purpose of making a playground. The said request was also accepted subject to certain conditions. The matter continued like this for nearly six decades. However, it appears that various inter se disputes arose between the members of the Catholic Young Men’s Association regarding the management of the Association. However, for the purpose of consideration of these appeals, it may not be necessary to delve into those facts. Be that as it may, it appears that the pothuyogam of the Church passed a resolution on 31.8.2003 seeking to withdraw the permission granted to the Catholic Young Men’s Association and decided to revoke the permission. The said resolution was forwarded to the Bishop, who issued Kalpana No.922/2003 on 31.10.2003, which led to the Catholic Young Men’s Association filing OS No.802/2003 seeking for a prohibitory injunction against the Church from forcefully evicting them from the plaint schedule property. Finding that the Catholic Young Men’s Association had no intention to vacate the premises, St.Michaels Church filed OS No.252/2004 seeking for a mandatory injunction directing the Catholic Young Men’s Association to furnish the accounts regarding the expenditure incurred by them for the construction of the building, so that they can pay the aforesaid amount and re

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top