IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
G. GIRISH, J
CHACKO – Appellant
Versus
MARY CHACKO – Respondent
O R D E R
Annexure-A3 order passed by the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-I, Kothamangalam, in CMP No.5089/2024 in M.C.No.22/2022 is under challenge in this petition filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 (in short, ‘ BNSS ’). As per the above order, the learned Magistrate dismissed the application of the petitioner, who is the respondent in that M.C., filed under the provisions of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act , 2005, to recall PW1 for further cross-examination. The reason stated by the learned Magistrate is that, other than a bald statement that some material facts were omitted to be asked to PW1 during cross-examination, nothing had been there in the petition to show the requirements for further examination of that witness. The learned Magistrate quoted the dictum laid down by this Court in Bibin Sabu @ Abi v. State of Kerala [ 2024 (4) KHC 681 ] for the dismissal of the above petition.
2. In the present petition, the petitioner would contend that the reason for re-opening the case for further evidence was argued, but it was not mentioned in the petition since it should not be understood by the other side, which will e
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.