SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 39450

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
R.KAMALAM – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO.24375 OF 2019



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.P.B.KRISHNAN (SR.), SRI.P.M.NEELAKANDAN, SRI.P.B.SUBRAMANYAN, SRI.SABU GEORGE, SRI.MANU VYASAN PETER, SMT.MEERA P.
For the Respondents: SRI.V.K.SHAMSUDHEEN

Assessment of tax under the Kerala Building Tax Act must account for constructions predating the appointed day, exempting them from taxation under Section 5(4).

Headnote:(A) Kerala Building Tax Act, 1975 - Section 5(4) - Assessment of tax on building constructed prior to appointed day - Petitioner contended that entire building was not liable for tax under Section 5(4) owing to part construction being from 1968 and thus prior to appointed day. Court emphasized past construction permitted before that date is exempt from taxation and the assessment must consider this point. Resulting tax assessment set aside due to jurisdiction errors by the assessing authority. (Paras 1, 4, and 5)

(B) Assessment Review - Authority must determine the applicability of tax provisions through substantiated evidence and past permissions granted. The errors in assessment call for re-evaluation of constructions relevant to taxation under existing regulations. (Para 5)

Table of Content
1. petitioner constructed building in 1968. (Para 1)
2. arguments on assessment of tax. (Para 2)
3. court's view on prior construction tax applicability. (Para 3)
4. court's instructions for reassessment. (Para 4)

JUDGMENT

The petitioner has filed the captioned writ petition contending that she constructed a commercial building during 1960s (1968), as evidenced by Exts.P1 to P4. The petitioner states that placing reliance on some additional construction made by her during 2013, as evidenced by Ext.P11 building permit, the entire area of the building, including the plinth area of the portion of the building constructed during 1960s is also brought to tax, with reference to the relevant provisions of Section 5 (4) of the Kerala Building Tax Act, 1975 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act” for short).

2. Heard Sri.Sabu George, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri.V.K.Shamsudheen, learned Senior Government Pleader.

3. The short issue arising for consideration in this writ petition is as regards the sustainability or otherwise of the assessment, as above. Sri.Shamsudheen is justified in contending that, going by Exts.P6 and P7, the details that were required to be furnished by the petitioner for seeking the benefit of non-application of the provisions of Section 5 (4) of the Act were not available, and that is why the original assessment was completed as above.

4. However, this Court notices that going by Ext.P1, permission for construction was granted during 1968 and licence fee with reference to the building in question is also seen collected pursuant to Exts.P4 and P5. When that be so, demanding tax for the entire area of construction with reference to the provisions of Section 5 (4) of the Act is not attracted insofar as the earlier portion of construction has been carried out prior to the appointed day. I also notice the Single Bench judgments of this Court inAbdul Rasheed v. Tahsildar [ 2005 (2) KLT 819 ] andBharath Sanchar Nigam Ltd. v. Tahsildar [ 2010 (4) KLT 680 ], which laid down the afore proposition.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top