SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 39504

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
EUGINE LUIZ – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 24446 OF 2022



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: D.ANIL KUMAR
For the Respondents: E.G.GORDEN, ELVIN PETER P.J., K.R.GANESH, GOURI BALAGOPAL, SREELEKSHMI A.S., ANU JOSEPH, ABHIJITH.K.ANIRUDHAN

A writ petition abates upon the death of the petitioner without appropriate substitution.

Headnote:In the present case referencing various statutes such as the Bye-law of the Central Board of Anglo Indian Education, it is determined that the petitioner, who has passed away, cannot continue the appeal. The Court finds that due to the absence of an impleading party, the case is rendered moot and consequently, dismissed as abated. The primary issue asserts that the death of the petitioner affects the maintainability of the writ petition. The Court deeply analyzes the legal sufficiency and issues arising from the continued prosecution of the writ in the absence of the petitioner. Ultimately, the ruling states that the writ petition will be dismissed due to the abatement caused by the petitioner's demise.

JUDGMENT

Sri.D.Anilkumar, the learned counsel for the petitioner points out that the petitioner is no more.

In the light of the afore, since no impleading has been carried out, this writ petition would stand dismissed as abated.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top