Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
MUNEER.V.P – Appellant
Versus
FAHIDA MAHAR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner directed to pay maintenance. (Para 1) |
| 2. court assessed justification of separation. (Para 2 , 4) |
| 3. contention regarding excessive maintenance. (Para 3) |
| 4. revision petition dismissed for lack of merit. (Para 5 , 7) |
| 5. husbands have duty of support. (Para 6 , 8) |
ORDER
This revision petition is filed against the order dated
11.04.2017 in MC No.192/2016 of Family Court, Thalassery. The respondents approached the Family Court with an application under Section 125 Cr.P.C. As per the above order, the petitioner is directed to pay maintenance at the rate of Rs.5,000/- to the 1st respondent and Rs.3,000/- each to respondents 2 to 4. Aggrieved by the same, this revision petition is filed.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents.
3. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that the quantum of maintenance awarded by the Family Court is excessive. The counsel also submitted that the wife is living separately without any sufficient reason and she is not entitled maintenance. The counsel further submitted that the Family Court ought to have rejected the application of the 1st respondent as she is living separately with
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
