IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Judge, J
Complainant – Appellant
Versus
Accused – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of the appeal and initial judgments. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments regarding the presumption under n.i. act. (Para 6 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. court's consideration of evidence and rebuttal of presumption. (Para 7 , 8 , 12 , 13) |
JUDGMENT
This appeal has been preferred by the complainant in C.C.No.205/2008 on the file of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Manjeri. After the trial of the said case, the learned Magistrate found the accused guilty of the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (for short “N.I. Act”), and he was convicted and sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of six months and to pay a fine of Rs.1,50,000/-. In default of payment of fine, the accused was ordered to undergo simple imprisonment for a further period of three months.
2. However, subsequently, the accused preferred an appeal.The learned Additional Sessions Judge (Adhoc) Fast Track-II, Manjeri, vide judgment dated 28.05.2010 in Criminal Appeal No.347/2009, set aside the judgment passed by the learned Magistrate and acquitted the accused. Challenging the said judgment of acquittal rendered in the above-said case, the complainant approached this Cou
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.