IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Devan Ramachandran, M.B. SNEHALATHA, JJ
Gopi K. – Appellant
Versus
Maintenance Tribunal, Perinthalmanna – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. settlement agreement reached and accepted. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court approved terms of settlement and directed compliance. (Para 3) |
DEVAN RAMACHANDIIAN & M.B.SNEHALATHA, JJ.
------1111~,,~1111-I-I------I-I-----~I--I-, W.A.No.1418 of 2024 I-,------I-----11-I---------,I-1I1,I-I-----
Dated this the 18th July, 2025 JUDGMENT M.B.Snehalatha. J When this appeal came up for hearing today, the learned counsel appearing for both sides submitted that the dispute between the appellant and party respondents 3 to 10 has been settled and a joint memo has been filed before this Court.
Respondents 1 and 2 are the official respondents.
2. We have examined the joint memo and we notice that it has been signed by the parties and subscribed by their counsel. The terms of the settlement are lawful and therefore the settlement arrived at by the parties is accepted.
3. In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, W.A.No.1418/2024 is disposed of in terms of the settlement.
4, The parties are directed to act implicitly in terms of the joint memo and shall comply all the terms therein, which do form part of this judgment.
Sd/-
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE Sd/-
M.B.SNEHALATHA JUDGE ab Merrro ` 1 /
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.