DEVAN RAMACHANDIIAN & M.B.SNEHALATHA, JJ.

------1111~,,~1111-I-I------I-I-----~I--I-, W.A.No.1418 of 2024 I-,------I-----11-I---------,I-1I1,I-I-----

Dated this the 18th July, 2025 JUDGMENT M.B.Snehalatha. J When this appeal came up for hearing today, the learned counsel appearing for both sides submitted that the dispute between the appellant and party respondents 3 to 10 has been settled and a joint memo has been filed before this Court.

Respondents 1 and 2 are the official respondents.

2. We have examined the joint memo and we notice that it has been signed by the parties and subscribed by their counsel. The terms of the settlement are lawful and therefore the settlement arrived at by the parties is accepted.

3. In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, W.A.No.1418/2024 is disposed of in terms of the settlement.

4, The parties are directed to act implicitly in terms of the joint memo and shall comply all the terms therein, which do form part of this judgment.

Sd/-

DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE Sd/-

M.B.SNEHALATHA JUDGE ab Merrro ` 1 / 3 WA No.141812024 (CA-ZOZ5ro28013 )

IN TIIE mGH count oF ]BRALA AT ERNAH(JlfARA writ Appeal N®. L4ie ®r2024 Gopi'K. Appellant Vs.

Maintenance Trib