Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K. NARENDRAN, MURALEE KRISHNA S., JJ
SOUTH INDIAN BANK LTD., REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER, VALLIKAVU BRANCH, VALLIKAVU, KARUNAGAPPALLY, KOLLAM, KERALA – Appellant
Versus
RAHIM H K., AGED 48 YEARS S/O HASSANKUNJU – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appellants challenge the interim order regarding payment conditions. (Para 2) |
| 2. arguments concerning the maintainability of the writ petition are presented. (Para 4) |
| 3. court discussions reference established case laws about alternative statutory remedies. (Para 5) |
| 4. court emphasizes need for statutory adherence in financial disputes. (Para 8) |
| 5. final decision allows preliminary issue on maintainability. (Para 9) |
Anil K. Narendran, J.
Respondents 1 and 2 in W.P.(C)No.22757 of 2025 filed by respondents 1 and 2 herein-writ petitioners have filed this writ appeal, invoking the provision under Section 5 (i) of Kerala High Court Act, 1958 , challenging the interim order dated 20.06.2025 of the learned Single Judge in that writ petition read thus;
“To consider the prayers sought for in the writ petition seeking instalment facility and to defer the coercive steps against the petitioners, as an interim measure, there will be a direction to the petitioners to remit an amount of Rs.3,00,000/-(Rupees Three lakhs only) within one month. It is made clear that, if the above payment is not made, the respondents will be at liberty to proceed further, in accordance with law.”
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
