JUDGMENT

1. The appellants are the defendants 1 & 2 in O.S.No.783/1993 of the Munsiff’s Court, Neyyattinkara. Defendants 1 and 2 are mother and son. The facts of the case relevant for this appeal are more or less admitted by the parties.

2. The suit was originally against defendants 1 & 2 for recovery of possession, for putting up the boundaries and injunction with respect to Plaint A schedule property which is ‘KLMNOPCDTSRQJ’ Plot allotted to him as per Ext.A1 Final Decree dated 02/06/1977 in O.S.No.1323/1968 of the same Court for partition. Originally the area was shown as 4.329 cents and later it was amended as 4.322 cents. The plaintiff was the 11^th defendant and the defendants 1 & 2 were the defendants 3 & 7 in O.S.No.1323/1968. The defendants 1 & 2 were allotted ‘RSTDEUVW’ as per Ext.A1 Final Decree. Except the plaintiff and the 11^th defendant (plaintiff herein), all the other parties in O.S.No.1323/1968 belonged to the Tharavadu of the Defendants 1 & 2 herein. The plaintiff and the 11^th defendant in O.S.No.1323/1968 were assignees of the co-owners of the Tharavadu. As per Ext.A1 Final Decree, the property therein having an extent of 14.298 cents identified by the Advocate Comm