IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P. G. Ajithkumar, J
SREEJAN S/O.GOPINATHAN – Appellant
Versus
ANUVRINDA(MINOR) – Respondent
ORDER
This revision petition is filed against the order dated
31.01.2017 in MC No.39/2016 of Family Court, Vatakara. As per the above order, the Family Court granted maintenance to the respondent at the rate of Rs.5,000/- per month. Even though this revision petition was filed on 23.06.2017, no interim order is passed by this Court and the revision is not even admitted.
There is no representation also for the petitioner.
2. This Court perused the impugned order. The Family Court considered the matter in detail and thereafter concluded that the respondent is entitled maintenance at the rate of Rs.5,000/-. I see no reason to interfere with the impugned order.
3. Section 125 Cr.P.C . is a benevolent provision to protect the rights of women who are abandoned by their husbands. In Bhuwan Mohan Singh v. Meena and Others [ 2014 KHC 4455 ], the Apex Court held as follows:
3. Be it ingeminated that S.125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short "the Code") was conceived to ameliorate the agony, anguish, financial suffering of a woman who left her matrimonial home for the reasons provided in the provision so that some suitable arrangements can be made by the Court and she can sustain herself
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.