IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P. G. Ajithkumar, J
RADHAKRISHNA PILLAI – Appellant
Versus
SREEJITH G – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. allegations of dishonour due to insufficient funds. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. cheque presented was beyond validity. (Para 4) |
| 3. court allows reconsideration of the complaint. (Para 5) |
O R D E R
This revision is filed against the order dated
04.07.2024 in CMP No. 2571/2023 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Sasthamcotta. The revision petitioner is the complainant in the above case and the 1st respondent is the accused (hereinafter the revision petitioner and the 1st respondent are mentioned as complainant and the accused). The case of the complainant in brief is as follows :
The accused is a person known to the complainant. He borrowed Rupees 25 Lakh from the complainant on 07.04.2023 and in discharge of said liability, issued a cheque dated 20.04.2023 drawn on the account maintained by the accused at Canara Bank, Thondayadu Branch. On 12.06.2023. the complainant presented the cheque for collection through Kerala Gramin Bank. Bharanikkav Branch, where he maintains account. The cheque was dishonoured for the reason Fund insufficient and returned to the complainant along with dishonour memo dated 13.06.2023. On 27.06.2023, the complainant issued a lawyer's n
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.