Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
MUHAMMED MUSTHAFA – Appellant
Versus
RASMILA P.P – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. family court granted maintenance orders. (Para 1) |
| 2. respondent argues inability to pay maintenance. (Para 2) |
| 3. court found no reason to interfere with family court's order. (Para 3) |
O R D E R
These revisions are filed against the order dated
31.07.2017 in MC No. 275/2016 on the file of the Family Court, Thalassery. As per the impugned order, the Family Court granted maintenance at the rate of Rs.6,000/- & Rs.4,000/- to the wife and child. The wife and child filed RP (FC) No. 281/2018 challenging the quantum of maintenance. The husband filed RP (FC) No. 525/2017 against the order granting maintenance. Therefore, these revisions are disposed of by a common order (hereinafter the parties are mentioned in accordance to their rank before the Family Court).
2. Before the Family Court, the petitioners and respondents were examined as PW1 and RW1. Two exhibits were also marked on the side of the respondent. After going through the evidence and the documents, the Family Court found that the petitioners are entitled maintenance at the rate of Rs.6,000/- and Rs.4,000/- respectively. The Family Court found that the petitioners are unable to maintain themselves and the respondent
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
