Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
M.A. ABDUL HAKHIM, J
IRUVAIKONAM BHAGAVATHI TEMPLE IRUVAIKONAM, THIRUPURAM DESOM, THIRUPURAM VILLAGE, NEYYATTINKARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. review petition dismissed for lack of proper representation. (Para 2 , 5) |
| 2. court's observation on existing documents and management. (Para 3 , 8) |
| 3. arguments regarding errors in findings and necessity of parties. (Para 4 , 7) |
| 4. only errors apparent can be corrected in review. (Para 6) |
| 5. final dismissal of both review petitions. (Para 9) |
ORDER
[RP Nos.721/2025, 876/2025]
1. The appellants 1 to 4 have filed R.P. No.721/2025 and the respondents 6 to 8 have filed R.P. No.876/2025 to review the judgment dated 04.06.2025 passed in the F.A.O. No.53/2025.
2. The appeal was filed challenging the Order dismissing O.P. (Trust) No.5/2022, seeking leave to institute a suit on behalf of the 1st petitioner temple under Section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure , 1908. This court dismissed the appeal by the impugned judgment, confirming the order of the Trial Court.
3. I heard the learned counsel for the Review Petitioners in both the R.Ps - Sri. V.S. Babu Gireesan and Sri. P.U. Shailajan.
4. The learned counsel for the Review Petitioners in R.P. No.721/2025 contended that there is an error apparent on the face of the record with respect to the findings of this Court in the impugne
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
