SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 41890

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
SREE MALAVIKA CHITS (INDIA) PVT. LTD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.REV.PET NO. 489 OF 2022



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.K.B.ARUNKUMAR, SMT.POOJA K.S.
For the Respondents: SR PP, SRI HRITHWIK C S

Litigants should be given a fair chance to rectify procedural defaults before case dismissal, emphasizing justice and opportunity.

Headnote:(A) Negotiable Instruments Act - Section 138 - Dismissal of complaint - Revision under Section 138 dismissed due to non-payment of costs for delay condonation - Court allowed the revision petition granting one more opportunity for payment of costs, increasing the amount to Rs. 2,000/- with conditions for case restoration. (Paras 3, 4)

(B) Opportunity to Prosecute - Courts should provide litigants with fair chances to rectify procedural defaults before dismissing the case, ensuring justice is served. (Paras 2)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, but the complaint was dismissed due to non-payment of the cost imposed by the magistrate for delay in filing the complaint.

Findings of Court:
The court allowed the revision petition, providing an increased cost amount and clear directives for the restoration of the complaint.

Issues: The main issue was whether a lack of payment for delay condonation should lead to automatic dismissal without a chance to rectify.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized on giving litigants another opportunity to rectify procedural defects as part of ensuring justice.

Result: Revision Petition Allowed.

Table of Content
1. complaint filed; dismissed due to non-payment. (Para 1 , 2)
2. court allowed one more opportunity with increased payment. (Para 4)

O R D E R

This Criminal Revision Petition is filed against the order dated 25.04.2022 in CMP No.4769/2021 and CMP No.4770/2021 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-I, Vatakara by which a complaint filed by the petitioner under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act is dismissed. Aggrieved by the same, the above revision petition is filed.

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor. Even though notice is issued to the 2nd respondent, there is no appearance. This Court as per order dated 23.07.2025 in Crl.MA. No.1/2025 declared the service to the 2nd respondent as complete.

3. This Court perused the impugned order.

The complaint was filed with a petition to condone the delay in filing the complaint. The learned Magistrate allowed that delay petition on payment of cost of Rs.1,000 before the District Legal Service Authority (DLSA), Kozhikode. The petitioner has not paid the cost and hence the delay condonation petition and the complaint was dismissed as per the impugned order.

4. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that there was some communication gap between the petitioner and the counsel and that is why the amount is not paid. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I think, one more opportunity can be given to the petitioner to prosecute the case. But the cost amount is to be increased.

Therefore, this Criminal Revision Petition is allowed in the following manner:

1. The petitioner shall deposit an amount of Rs.2,000/- before the District Legal Service Authority, Kozhikode within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and produce the receipt before the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-I, Vatakara.

2. Once the receipt of payment is produced by the petitioner, the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-I, Vatakara will restore CMP No.4769/2021 and CMP No.4770/2021 and allow the delay condonation petition and will proceed with the case, in accordance with law.

3. The petitioner will appear before the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-I, Vatakara on

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top