Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K. NARENDRAN, P. V. BALAKRISHNAN, JJ
N. Pramod – Appellant
Versus
The Commissioner, Malabar Devaswom Board – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks to quash auction notice and address administrative issues. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. details of auction procedure and confirmation before writ notice. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court finds no grounds for interference in auction proceedings. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. court directs consideration of pending representation. (Para 8) |
JUDGMENT
Anil K. Narendran, J.
The petitioner, who is a devotee of Sree Annapoorneshwari Temple, Puthucode, which is one among the 18 temples under the Naduvil Madom Group of Temples, which is a controlled institution under the additional 6th respondent Malabar Devaswom Board, has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India , seeking a writ of certiorari to quash Ext.P6 auction notice dated 09.12.2024 issued by the 3rd respondent Manager of Sree Annapoorneshwari Temple; a writ of mandamus commanding the 2nd respondent Assistant Commissioner, Malabar Devaswom Board, Palakkad to take necessary action pursuant to Ext.P5 order dated 09.10.2024 of the 1st respondent Commissioner, Malabar Devaswom Board; and a writ of mandamus commanding the 1st respondent Commissioner to consider Ext.P7 representation dated 17.12.2024 made by th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
